View Mobile Site
 

Ask the Expert

Signal Photos

Megan’s Law sex-offender listings are not complete

Not all offenders must register online, but all must register with law enforcement

Posted: March 16, 2013 3:05 p.m.
Updated: March 16, 2013 3:05 p.m.
 

While 52 convicted sex offenders are listed on the Megan’s Law website as residing in the Santa Clarita Valley, the actual number is around 200, a Sheriff’s Department official said.

According to the Megan’s Law website, approximately 25 percent of registered sex offenders cannot be publicly posted online by law.

“Whether public disclosure is permitted is based on the type of sex crime for which the person is required to register,” the website said.

On Feb. 18, The Signal checked online the listing of 53 sex offenders registered to post their identities and addresses by law.

Revisiting the same list last week, The Signal found three changes — the addresses of two sex offenders had been revised. For the third, there was no online listing for an individual who was on the list in February.

Although not all sex offenders are required to register publicly, all are required to register with local law enforcement.
Local deputies check at least a year that the registered sex offenders are living where they should be, sheriff’s Sgt. Darren Harris.

As well, registered sex offenders are required to report to the local sheriff’s station on once a year within five days before or after their birthdays.

A local detective is assigned to keep track of people convicted of sex offenses who are ordered to register as sex offenders, Harris said.

jholt@signalscv.com
661-287-5527
on Twitter @jamesarthurholt

 

 

Mar. 16, 2013 03:05p.m. EDT Megan’s Law sex-offender listings are not complete The Signal

While 52 convicted sex offenders are listed on the Megan’s Law website as residing in the Santa Clarita Valley, the actual number is around 200, a Sheriff’s Department official said.

According to the Megan’s Law website, approximately 25 percent of registered sex offenders cannot be publicly posted online by law.

“Whether public disclosure is permitted is based on the type of sex crime for which the person is required to register,” the website said.

On Feb. 18, The Signal checked online the listing of 53 sex offenders registered to post their identities and addresses by law.

Revisiting the same list last week, The Signal found three changes — the addresses of two sex offenders had been revised. For the third, there was no online listing for an individual who was on the list in February.

Although not all sex offenders are required to register publicly, all are required to register with local law enforcement.
Local deputies check at least a year that the registered sex offenders are living where they should be, sheriff’s Sgt. Darren Harris.

As well, registered sex offenders are required to report to the local sheriff’s station on once a year within five days before or after their birthdays.

A local detective is assigned to keep track of people convicted of sex offenses who are ordered to register as sex offenders, Harris said.

jholt@signalscv.com
661-287-5527
on Twitter @jamesarthurholt

 

 

Copyright 2011 MorrisMultimedia . All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed

Comments

livelovelead: Posted: March 17, 2013 3:30 p.m.

Nice to know, but you never clarified what type of sex crimes determine if they are listed publicly or not. It would be helpful to know what kinds of crimes they have commited, that allow them not to list publicly.


ohhyaa: Posted: March 17, 2013 9:23 p.m.

The Megan's Law Website is an okay resource for general searches. There are a couple of inaccurate postings, that I am aware of, and on some of the violators no picture is posted, stating not available, which I find confusing.

Here are two examples: 1) a registered offender on the site shows in violation, but is actually in jail. Next court date is in April on a million dollar hold. 2) a low risk offender that lives or lived up the street from my house is listed in two different zip codes therefore listed twice.

There are so many offenders in California. We are like Florida, an almost safe haven for offenders with so many libral legal groups protecting these vial pigs rights. Read the new verbage on the Megan's Law site printed in red and effective January 2013. It's what this above article is saying... some info needs removed from the website. From what I got it is due to a pending law suit, John Doe vs. Kamal Harris (our county DA). If I correctly understood a recent article it is the ACLU defending this scum. It's no wonder they flock to our state. We probably give them free assistance to boot. Makes me sick.


scvforall: Posted: March 18, 2013 1:50 a.m.

Last week I e-mailed the Sheriff Station about 2 of the offenders on the list living within a block of a preschool, 4 blocks from a park and an elementary school, and received no response!

I would hope living this close to any of the 3 would be illegal.



You need to be a registered user to post a comment. Please click here to register.

The Signal encourages readers to interact with one another, following the guidelines outlined in our Comment/Moderation Policy. Click here to read it.

To report offensive or inappropriate comments, e-mail abuse@signalscv.com. The content posted from readers of signalscv.com does not necessarily represent the views of The Signal or Morris Multimedia. By submitting this form you agree to the terms and conditions listed above. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

 
 

Powered By
Morris Technology
Please wait ...