View Mobile Site
 

Ask the Expert

Signal Photos

UPDATE: Saugus, Newhall districts approve preliminary layoff notices

Posted: March 6, 2013 2:28 p.m.
Updated: March 6, 2013 6:04 p.m.
 

Thirty employees in the Newhall School District and the Saugus Union School District have been put on notice that they may be laid off before the beginning of next school year.

The Newhall School District board voted 5-0 Tuesday night to send out preliminary layoff notices to 26 temporary classroom and physical education teachers, district Superintendent Marc Winger said Wednesday.

Winger attributed the number of notices, in part, to declining student enrollment in the district.

Since state funding is largely determined on a per-pupil basis, smaller enrollment often means less money for districts.

In a separate vote, the Newhall board voted 3-1, with one board member abstaining, to send a similar preliminary layoff notice to a music teacher, Winger said.

“In the context of what we call budget discipline, no program should be exempt from being studied for efficiency,” Winger said. “Not in these days. Not in these environments.”

But Winger said he was certain that not every teacher who received a preliminary notice would end up being laid off.

“I’m sure of it,” Winger said. “But how many won’t be brought back, that’s the question.”

School districts are required by law to notify certificated employees — such as counselors, assistant principals and teachers — if there is a possibility they will be laid off for the next school year.

Those employees have to be notified by March 15.

But school districts have until May 15 to determine how many of those employees will actually be laid off.
Members of the Saugus Union School District board also voted Tuesday night to send out preliminary layoff notices.

With a 4-0 vote, the board approved sending notices to three of the district’s special education personnel, according to Saugus district Superintendent Joan Lucid.

Board member Rose Koscielny missed Tuesday’s meeting because she was sick, Lucid said.

Lucid said Wednesday the notices are motivated entirely by falling enrollment in the district’s special education classes, which reflects similar enrollment decreases across the district.

“As you’re losing your population, just by default you’re going to lose some special education youngsters,” Lucid said.

Lucid estimated Saugus district enrollment has fallen from 10,700 students in 2007 to around 10,200 this year.

The Saugus district will continue monitoring its enrollment figures until the May 15 deadline to make sure the proper staffing decisions are being made, Lucid said.

“We’re going to make a decision based on what our numbers tell us,” Lucid said.

The Sulphur Springs School District in Canyon Country sent out preliminary layoff notices to 16 teachers last week.

Lmoney@signalscv.com
661-287-5525
On Twitter @LukeMMoney

 

 

 

Mar. 6, 2013 02:28p.m. EST UPDATE: Saugus, Newhall districts approve preliminary layoff notices The Signal

Thirty employees in the Newhall School District and the Saugus Union School District have been put on notice that they may be laid off before the beginning of next school year.

The Newhall School District board voted 5-0 Tuesday night to send out preliminary layoff notices to 26 temporary classroom and physical education teachers, district Superintendent Marc Winger said Wednesday.

Winger attributed the number of notices, in part, to declining student enrollment in the district.

Since state funding is largely determined on a per-pupil basis, smaller enrollment often means less money for districts.

In a separate vote, the Newhall board voted 3-1, with one board member abstaining, to send a similar preliminary layoff notice to a music teacher, Winger said.

“In the context of what we call budget discipline, no program should be exempt from being studied for efficiency,” Winger said. “Not in these days. Not in these environments.”

But Winger said he was certain that not every teacher who received a preliminary notice would end up being laid off.

“I’m sure of it,” Winger said. “But how many won’t be brought back, that’s the question.”

School districts are required by law to notify certificated employees — such as counselors, assistant principals and teachers — if there is a possibility they will be laid off for the next school year.

Those employees have to be notified by March 15.

But school districts have until May 15 to determine how many of those employees will actually be laid off.
Members of the Saugus Union School District board also voted Tuesday night to send out preliminary layoff notices.

With a 4-0 vote, the board approved sending notices to three of the district’s special education personnel, according to Saugus district Superintendent Joan Lucid.

Board member Rose Koscielny missed Tuesday’s meeting because she was sick, Lucid said.

Lucid said Wednesday the notices are motivated entirely by falling enrollment in the district’s special education classes, which reflects similar enrollment decreases across the district.

“As you’re losing your population, just by default you’re going to lose some special education youngsters,” Lucid said.

Lucid estimated Saugus district enrollment has fallen from 10,700 students in 2007 to around 10,200 this year.

The Saugus district will continue monitoring its enrollment figures until the May 15 deadline to make sure the proper staffing decisions are being made, Lucid said.

“We’re going to make a decision based on what our numbers tell us,” Lucid said.

The Sulphur Springs School District in Canyon Country sent out preliminary layoff notices to 16 teachers last week.

Lmoney@signalscv.com
661-287-5525
On Twitter @LukeMMoney

 

 

 

Copyright 2011 MorrisMultimedia . All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed

Comments

tacalert: Posted: March 6, 2013 6:28 p.m.

And for all the suckers who voted for Prop 30, shame on you. Now you see that it was for nothing. Read the language of Prop 30 and you will see where the money really went.


Bdeezine: Posted: March 6, 2013 6:45 p.m.

tacalert: Firstly, I agree with your statement. In this case though, it sounds like it is due to a drop in enrollment. In which case, I am glad they are monitoring the numbers based on enrollment. 500 less students means a bit less staff.


Baddog1: Posted: March 6, 2013 6:55 p.m.

Maybe we should build a new school in Castaic!


rbrat: Posted: March 6, 2013 7:14 p.m.

If enrollment is declining, why is the SUSD spending untold amounts of money to open the Emblem Academy? Adding yet another school seems counter-intuitive. Then again, that seems to be the MO of the SUSD. Maybe the builders in RiverVillage are having a tough time selling houses? Sounds suspiciously like West Creek Academy.


sreilly11: Posted: March 6, 2013 8:48 p.m.

So sorry people are losing their jobs..........maybe their Union leaders will at least have them over to dinner.


tacalert: Posted: March 6, 2013 9:34 p.m.

Bdeezine: I agree with you also. My statement was meant that no additional funding is coming our way as a result of Prop 30. It was sold off as no layoffs in schools and hopes of reduced class sizes. Not happening here.

rbrat: Emblem is a waste of money. They could justify it by closing Santa Clarita school (oldest school in the district) which is only 1 mile away. SUSD could then give the school site to the park next door.


itzreality: Posted: March 7, 2013 2:33 a.m.

I agree about the Prop 30 sale to the public! Isn't is amazing how no administrators or top level folks get cut, only teachers where our children suffer directly?


Rocketeer: Posted: March 7, 2013 2:39 a.m.

Every year x number of seniors graduate. Every year y number of six year olds begin first grade. So are there 500 fewer fist graders than seniors next year? Possibly. Birth rates are down due to Barney Frank and Nancy Pelosi's engineered recession.

But I know a number of parents who have switched their kids to private school. Why? Because private school is 5 days a week. Because private school is all-inclusive (sports, activities, lunch, etc.) I think this is also a part of "declining enrollment."

Prop 30 was Jerry Brown's extortion. We knew it's "benefits" were a lie, but his threats if it did not pass were not. I did not vote for 30 because eff him. But I understand why so many simpletons felt threatened and did.


Nitesho: Posted: March 7, 2013 10:15 a.m.

This is fantastic.

Teachers love unions, unions love dems, dems love taxes, taxes make people leave, people leaving causes low enrollment, teachers get layoff notices, Union coffers still filled.

the circle of life for a teacher.

OWN IT CTA

OWN IT.


bartman: Posted: March 7, 2013 11:06 a.m.

Using 2007 as a baseline is bogus. Why not talk about the population increase from 2010? That is why we have a census...How can Saugus state that the decline in in population exists when the city reports continual growth? Anyone else notice all the new building going on? How about the real estate reports? What about unemployment? This is nothing more than politics. A requirement they must do by law.

Traditionally teachers have always been provided these notices in March and this is not a function of economic or demographic shifts. If it were, then SUSD would not be growing by opening new schools. They would be increasing class size and laying off a lot more teachers than reported.

If we want to use a baseline use the same year as the CPI(1964) and show me that dollars spent per child are the same of more cost effective than then. Then show us that the performance is better. Then I will believe this.


timothymyers02: Posted: March 7, 2013 11:59 a.m.

We are doing our part to raise enrollment for the SUSD and Hart District. Selling our six bedroom house that will have NO primary/secondary schoolchildren come May to a family that will hopefully fill it up with school age kids!


timothymyers02: Posted: March 7, 2013 12:06 p.m.

bartman:

While enrollment is not actually declining growth has flattened. During the late 90's and early aughts the Hart District was adding about 1,000 students per year and the elementary schools were adding 400-600, which amounts to a whole elementary school. SUSD in particular cut deals with developers to build neighborhood schools extrapolating this growth over 20 years, and it came to a screeching halt in 2007, leaving them with incredible excess capacity. Remember, the for reals closed an entire school (Bouquet Canyon) and effectively closed Emblem.

"Growth" reported by the City is illusory. The growth results from the annexation of neighborhoods that have sometimes existed for decades in the County, and whose denizens were already part of school districts.

As for new building, while it is recovering, it still runs about 20% of what it was in 2006, the peak year.



You need to be a registered user to post a comment. Please click here to register.

The Signal encourages readers to interact with one another, following the guidelines outlined in our Comment/Moderation Policy. Click here to read it.

To report offensive or inappropriate comments, e-mail abuse@signalscv.com. The content posted from readers of signalscv.com does not necessarily represent the views of The Signal or Morris Multimedia. By submitting this form you agree to the terms and conditions listed above. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

 
 

Powered By
Morris Technology
Please wait ...