View Mobile Site
 

Ask the Expert

Signal Photos

Sulphur Springs faces potential teacher layoffs

Posted: February 28, 2013 6:31 p.m.
Updated: February 28, 2013 6:31 p.m.
 

Sixteen teachers in the Sulphur Springs School District have been put on notice that they may not be teaching in the Canyon Country school district next year, district officials said Thursday.

Under state law, school districts are required to notify certificated employees — including teachers, counselors and assistant principals — if there is a possibility they will be laid off for the next school year.

Those employees have to be notified by March 15, according to Sulphur Springs district Superintendent Robert Nolet.
Last year the district sent out 42 such notices, according to board documents.

Sulphur Springs board member Denis DeFigueiredo, who was part of the unanimous vote to send out the notices Wednesday night, said layoffs are the last resort for the district.

“The last thing we want to see are teachers being removed from classrooms,” DeFigueiredo said.

Nolet said Thursday the recommendation is fueled by uncertainty in terms of future state funding.

As a result, the district needs to be financially cautious, Nolet said.

“We just simply can’t go into next year guaranteeing positions we may not be able to afford,” Nolet said.

Much of the uncertainty comes from a proposal by Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown to change the way school districts are funded.

Under that proposal, schools with higher populations of English-language-learning or low-income students would stand to receive more in state funding.

Nolet said it is unclear when, or if, that funding model will go into place.

Another wrinkle is forthcoming funding from the Proposition 30 tax hikes, which raised the state income and sales tax rates in part to provide money for education.

While Nolet said Proposition 30 will eventually turn out to be financially beneficial for the district, the measure mostly spares districts from additional budget cuts rather than injecting new money into schools.

“Even with this proposal districts are certainly not flush with money,” Nolet said.

Wednesday’s vote is the first step in determining the extent of any staff layoffs in the district, Nolet said. The district has until May 15 to finalize what the cuts might be.

“Our goal will be to try and solidify what we believe our funding will be and, if at all possible, try and rescind many if not all of those notices,” Nolet said.

Lmoney@signalscv.com
661-287-5525
On Twitter @LukeMMoney

 

Feb. 28, 2013 06:31p.m. EST Sulphur Springs faces potential teacher layoffs The Signal

Sixteen teachers in the Sulphur Springs School District have been put on notice that they may not be teaching in the Canyon Country school district next year, district officials said Thursday.

Under state law, school districts are required to notify certificated employees — including teachers, counselors and assistant principals — if there is a possibility they will be laid off for the next school year.

Those employees have to be notified by March 15, according to Sulphur Springs district Superintendent Robert Nolet.
Last year the district sent out 42 such notices, according to board documents.

Sulphur Springs board member Denis DeFigueiredo, who was part of the unanimous vote to send out the notices Wednesday night, said layoffs are the last resort for the district.

“The last thing we want to see are teachers being removed from classrooms,” DeFigueiredo said.

Nolet said Thursday the recommendation is fueled by uncertainty in terms of future state funding.

As a result, the district needs to be financially cautious, Nolet said.

“We just simply can’t go into next year guaranteeing positions we may not be able to afford,” Nolet said.

Much of the uncertainty comes from a proposal by Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown to change the way school districts are funded.

Under that proposal, schools with higher populations of English-language-learning or low-income students would stand to receive more in state funding.

Nolet said it is unclear when, or if, that funding model will go into place.

Another wrinkle is forthcoming funding from the Proposition 30 tax hikes, which raised the state income and sales tax rates in part to provide money for education.

While Nolet said Proposition 30 will eventually turn out to be financially beneficial for the district, the measure mostly spares districts from additional budget cuts rather than injecting new money into schools.

“Even with this proposal districts are certainly not flush with money,” Nolet said.

Wednesday’s vote is the first step in determining the extent of any staff layoffs in the district, Nolet said. The district has until May 15 to finalize what the cuts might be.

“Our goal will be to try and solidify what we believe our funding will be and, if at all possible, try and rescind many if not all of those notices,” Nolet said.

Lmoney@signalscv.com
661-287-5525
On Twitter @LukeMMoney

 

Copyright 2011 MorrisMultimedia . All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed

Comments

itzreality: Posted: February 28, 2013 10:39 p.m.

What about administrators being cut to keep the classrooms in tack! It is amazing how our children always have to bear the brunt of these actions.


lars: Posted: March 1, 2013 9:26 a.m.

Much of the uncertainty comes from a proposal by Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown to change the way school districts are funded.

Under that proposal, schools with higher populations of English-language-learning or low-income students would stand to receive more in state funding.

Nolet said it is unclear when, or if, that funding model will go into place.

Another wrinkle is forthcoming funding from the Proposition 30 tax hikes, which raised the state income and sales tax rates in part to provide money for education.

While Nolet said Proposition 30 will eventually turn out to be financially beneficial for the district, the measure mostly spares districts from additional budget cuts rather than injecting new money into schools.

..........................................................................
In addition to less money going to the schools in communities that pay more taxes, there is the trend for those communities to pay for services.
The tax money taken now can go to poorer communities and union benefits.

This is seen in the plan for toll carpool lanes in santa clarita. There are not toll lanes in poor communities.
This is also seen in the city sinking almost $50 Million of taxpayer money into the newhall dump, rather than alleviate traffic problems.


Nitesho: Posted: March 1, 2013 10:26 a.m.

OWNED IT. Teachers support the unions, unions support the democratic party.

OWNED

IT.


FunTimeSportSharks: Posted: March 1, 2013 7:05 p.m.

What good is Prop. CK (which was just passed to upgrade the aging schools in the SSSD) if they don't have enough teachers for all the kids? When is the money from Prop. 30 gonna show up and save the day? Agree, administrators need to give themselves a pay cut so they can keep the teachers. It is ridiculous that Kindergarten classes have over 20 students in them and other classes over 2nd grade can have close to or well over 30 students... INSANE! Here's an idea, keep the lesser paid Assitant Principals at each site for disapline and simple daily school business and have ONE Principal over see two or three schools? Maybe shut down the one school in the district with the lowest enrollment and redraw the boundaries to save money since everyone's class sizes are huge anyway (similar to what Saugus did a couple of years back). I mean hey, what's a few more bodies in each class room... the teacher's aren't gonna notice if they have 35 in a class or 40, they already can barely fit in the classroom now as it is (heavy sarcasim, can you hear it?). Or really be revolutionary and make it a four day school week... no one will notice with all of those furlough days we've had the past few years anyway. SO GLAD the great State of California is putting our kids LAST! =P



You need to be a registered user to post a comment. Please click here to register.

The Signal encourages readers to interact with one another, following the guidelines outlined in our Comment/Moderation Policy. Click here to read it.

To report offensive or inappropriate comments, e-mail abuse@signalscv.com. The content posted from readers of signalscv.com does not necessarily represent the views of The Signal or Morris Multimedia. By submitting this form you agree to the terms and conditions listed above. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

 
 

Powered By
Morris Technology
Please wait ...