View Mobile Site

Ask the Expert

Signal Photos

High-speed rail meetings coming to the Santa Clarita Valley

Posted: July 24, 2014 12:34 p.m.
Updated: July 24, 2014 12:34 p.m.

Officials from the California High-Speed Rail Authority will hold a series of meetings — two locally — next month to discuss possible routes for the bullet train as it snakes its way through Southern California and potentially through the Santa Clarita Valley.

The first of those meetings is scheduled Aug. 5 at William S. Hart Park, 24151 Newhall Ave. in Newhall. The other meeting in the Santa Clarita Valley will be held at the Acton-Agua Dulce Library, 33792 Crown Valley Road, Acton.
Additional meetings will be held throughout August in Palmdale, Sylmar, Burbank, Lake View Terrace and downtown Los Angeles.

All meetings will be from 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m.

The Santa Clarita Valley area would be on the Palmdale-to-Burbank section of the overall high-speed rail project that’s supposed to link Southern California with San Francisco and, eventually, Sacramento.

But the exact route for the proposed train, including the route between Palmdale and Burbank, has been a topic of discussion for years.

Several alignments have been proposed to take it through the Santa Clarita Valley, including routes through Sand Canyon and Acton.

But those options have met with resistance. Residents in Sand Canyon say the train would affect or displace homes, a church and two schools.

Officials from the High-Speed Rail Authority have said they are examining the option of taking the train through a tunnel as it makes its way through Sand Canyon, which could lessen some of its effects.

Another possible alignment that local officials have been favoring would take the train out of the Santa Clarita Valley entirely by routing it directly from Palmdale to Burbank.

Los Angeles County Supervisor Michael D. Antonovich has sent a letter in favor of that idea to the High-Speed Rail Authority board. Santa Clarita City Council members have expressed their support for the option as well.

California voters originally approved the high-speed rail project in 2008 with the idea of connecting Anaheim and Los Angeles Union Station to San Francisco, with links at other large population centers around the state.
The train is projected to travel at speeds of up to 220 mph.
On Twitter @LukeMMoney




src: Posted: July 24, 2014 3:52 p.m.

Just kill this thing. It's a losing proposition. Just another thing the taxpayers will have to keep afloat in a state where more and more taxpayers leave every day.

underwater: Posted: July 24, 2014 4:55 p.m.

use the funds to combat the drought issue. They are showing the waste liberal Democrats do.

chefgirl358: Posted: July 25, 2014 12:05 a.m.

This is the stupidest, most expensive idea our state has ever come up with.

ricketzz: Posted: July 25, 2014 9:48 a.m.

It may be "stupid" but it's the way modern people get around. I suspect the airlines are poisoning the discussions; trying to derail the project. Planes are inefficient and harmful to the atmosphere.

Arimathea: Posted: July 25, 2014 1:43 p.m.

The article is incomplete. What is the date of the Acton/Agua Dulce meeting? There is no link for more information?

This is a horrendous waste of money, time, and resources in my opinion. Airplanes and buses are more flexible and less harmful to the environment. Train service is used most efficiently when there are frequent trains, so if you miss one you know there's another coming along soon.

And a very basic question: where are people who are using this train going to park? The park & ride facilities fill up quickly at every train station around here, I can't imagine Palmdale or Burbank are any different.

aci2nuo: Posted: July 25, 2014 2:41 p.m.

waste of money. Drought is a more pressing issue at this time, agree with src comments

Denn99: Posted: July 26, 2014 9:19 p.m.

Ricktzz and his liberal friends are the reason California is going down the toilet. Flying is inefficient. How can you even say that with a straight face. LA to NY in 4 hours. Invest that money in Desalinization plants so we don't ever have to worry about droughts again, or at least only minimally. You probably are in favor of bringing more illegals in to LA when we have no water for them. BTW, I wonder how many tax dollars it costs to have this meeting. I wouldn't be surprised if it costs 50k.

You need to be a registered user to post a comment. Please click here to register.

The Signal encourages readers to interact with one another, following the guidelines outlined in our Comment/Moderation Policy. Click here to read it.

To report offensive or inappropriate comments, e-mail The content posted from readers of does not necessarily represent the views of The Signal or Morris Multimedia. By submitting this form you agree to the terms and conditions listed above. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.


Powered By
Morris Technology
Please wait ...