View Mobile Site
 

Ask the Expert

Signal Photos

Santa Clarita City Council gives final approval to city budget

Spending plan includes increasing the city’s general fund operating reserve to 18 percent

Posted: June 25, 2014 9:24 a.m.
Updated: June 25, 2014 9:24 a.m.
 

Santa Clarita City Council members gave final approval Tuesday night to a $191.5 million city budget for the next fiscal year, with money set aside to help address the city’s aging infrastructure and fund a series of capital projects.

The approved budget for the 2014-2015 fiscal year, which begins July 1, includes projected general fund revenues of $91.3 million with general fund appropriations of $90.8 million.

Under the new budget, City Manager Ken Striplin has said, general fund revenues as a whole will return to pre-recession levels.

Some of the major goals in the budget for the upcoming fiscal year, city officials said, are planning ahead to address Santa Clarita’s future needs, addressing the city’s aging infrastructure and increasing the city’s general fund operating reserve to 18 percent.

Increasing that reserve is included in the adopted budget.

The other goals are addressed partly in the city’s Capital Improvement Program budget for the next fiscal year, which is around $39.1 million.

The Capital Improvement Program budget includes funding for future projects — such as $520,000 to design a tennis complex at Central Park and $50,000 to conduct a planing and outreach process to re-evaluate Old Orchard Park — as well as maintenance, such as $1 million for the city’s sidewalk repair program.

The budget also includes $135,000 for continued advocacy regarding the proposed Cemex mine in Soledad Canyon and a $100,000 increase in the city’s contribution to the Santa Clarita Valley Senior Center — bringing the city’s total contribution to around $750,000, according to Striplin.

Other spending outlined in the budget includes $10,000 to put on a “beach party” in Canyon Country and $80,000 for holiday decorations in Newhall.

Lmoney@signalscv.com
661-287-5525
On Twitter @LukeMMoney

 

Comments

bobforte: Posted: June 25, 2014 2:16 p.m.

Again with the holiday decorations in Newhall. Another waste of money.


Unreal: Posted: June 25, 2014 3:06 p.m.

Since being annexed into the city for the past year and a half the hillside maintenance crew for the hillside behind my house that I pay a separate tax for is not as good as the county was. I was surprised, I thought we would see the city do a better job

The county came every week checking the sprinklers trimming etc. Now I never see them unless I call. The county gardeners used to pull weeds, the city team weed wacked them.

I think they need more money to get them the help they need to do a decent job. They need to hire more people if they are going to agree to take over new areas.


SReilly12: Posted: June 25, 2014 6:24 p.m.

Don't like this budget go look at what Brown approved.....$2.5 million for renovations to the Governor's mansion - you know the one that no one has lived in since Regan and the one he has no plans to live in. Time and time again these people get voted into office and time and time again they continue to let you down..........how many times are we going to travel down the Brown highway and get robbed at every turn.



You need to be a registered user to post a comment. Please click here to register.

The Signal encourages readers to interact with one another, following the guidelines outlined in our Comment/Moderation Policy. Click here to read it.

To report offensive or inappropriate comments, e-mail abuse@signalscv.com. The content posted from readers of signalscv.com does not necessarily represent the views of The Signal or Morris Multimedia. By submitting this form you agree to the terms and conditions listed above. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

 
 

Powered By
Morris Technology
Please wait ...