View Mobile Site

Ask the Expert

Signal Photos

The California droughtland

Governor says state is in historic dryspell; locals reassured

Posted: January 17, 2014 10:26 a.m.
Updated: January 17, 2014 1:50 p.m.

California is nearly as dry as it’s ever been. High water marks rim half-full reservoirs. Cities are rationing water.

Clerics are praying for rain. Ranchers are selling cattle, and farmers are fallowing fields.

Gov. Jerry Brown formally proclaimed a drought Friday, saying California is in the midst of perhaps its worst dry spell in a century.

He made the announcement in San Francisco amid increasing pressure from lawmakers and as firefighters in Glendora battled flare-ups in th Colby Fire that chased thousands of people from their homes.

Reservoir levels in the north and central parts of the state were more depleted than in Southern California, but Brown still asked area residents to do their part to conserve — and gave a nod to the politics of water in the vast state.

“The drought accentuates and further displays the conflicts between north and south and between urban and rural parts of the state. So, as governor, I’ll be doing my part to bring people together and working through this.”

In the Santa Clarita Valley, the general manager of Castaic Lake Water Agency — which supplies about half the drinking water in the area — reassured local residents, noting the agency’s “water-supply portfolio” — that is, sources from which to draw water — are varied. There is sufficient water to meet 2014 demands, General Manager Dan Masnada said.

“However, recognizing that 60 percent to 70 percent of valley water use is for landscape irrigation, we urge all valley residents and businesses to go to the agency’s and their local water retailers’ websites for useful information on how to reduce exterior use,” Masnada said.

“This one tip alone provides the biggest bang for the buck when it comes to stretching our increasingly valuable water resources.”

Both Masnada and state Sen. Fran Pavley, D-Agoura Hills, who represents part of the Santa Clarita Valley, praised Brown for declaring a drought.

“With a hotter and drier future, we can’t duplicate water policies of the 20th century to address challenges of the 21st,” said Pavley, chairwoman of the Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee. “We need to be resourceful and create new water supplies with cost-effective, sustainable strategies.”

Farmers and ranchers in the nation’s No. 1 farm state already are making hard choices to conserve. Some cities are in danger of running out of water. And the first snow survey of the winter found more bare ground than fluffy white stuff — a key barometer of future supply.

“I am a fifth-generation cattle rancher, and it has never been this bad ever in my lifetime — and from my family’s history, it’s never been anywhere close to this bad ever,” said Kevin Kester, 58. He said his family’s records show the area’s worst drought previously was in the 1890s.

Kester’s Central California ranch normally gets 20 inches of rain between October and April. It’s gotten about a half-inch of precipitation since late fall. His cattle usually graze on lush green hillsides in winter. Now, they’re eating hay instead — a proposition that is too expensive to continue for long.

“I hope it’s something we can tell our great-grandkids about, but right now we’re just trying to figure out how we’re going to survive,” he said.

The drought doesn’t bode well for California’s notorious wildfire season, either.

Previous super-dry years led to catastrophic wildfire seasons in California in 2003 and 2007, said Tom Scott, a natural resources specialist with the University of California system. Fire crews beat back a wildfire northeast of Los Angeles earlier this week, but it was a stark reminder of the dry and dangerous conditions.

“People say that the fire season is starting early, but I guess you could say it never ended,” Scott said. “If you live in the backcountry, come July you probably should be thinking about putting your valuables in storage.”

Droughts also are persisting or intensifying elsewhere in the U.S.

On Wednesday, federal officials said they were designating portions of Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, Kansas, Texas, Utah, Arkansas, Hawaii, Idaho, Oklahoma and California as primary natural disaster areas, highlighting the financial strain facing farmers in those regions.

Even in the moist Pacific Northwest, things were a little bit drier.

In Seattle, rainfall dropped by nearly 70 percent in December, with just 1.66 inches falling. Ski resorts are opening several weeks late, and a Bavarian-themed town in the Cascade Mountains had to modify its annual “ice fest” because there isn’t enough snow on the ground for activities. A plan to truck in snow was scrapped with high temperatures forecast this weekend.

And despite heavy flooding in Colorado in September, large portions of Colorado and Wyoming are abnormally dry, while ranchers on the plains of southeastern Colorado have severe drought conditions.

In California, the governor’s drought declaration will help battle unemployment in the agriculture industry as fields are left fallow.

Nearly 10,000 people lost their jobs during the last drought in 2009, said Karen Ross, California’s agriculture secretary. The drought also increases the burden on food banks in rural and agricultural communities.

The lack of rain also could have long-standing implications for the demand for crops that are almost entirely exclusive to California.

Eighty percent of the world’s almonds, for example, are grown in California, and the Almond Board of California receives 3 cents for every pound sold to build future demand for the nut. With many almond growers having to irrigate their crops three months early, a smaller crop might put a dent in the board’s ability to market almonds as broadly as it has been, said David Phippen, an almond grower who serves on the board.

“There’s huge implications everywhere you look,” he said. “What about five years down the road?”


balld13: Posted: January 17, 2014 2:37 p.m.

Maybe all those people moving to our sanctuary cities can bring a case of water with them. That should give our Governor a great warm and fuzzy.

LosRubios: Posted: January 17, 2014 4:50 p.m.

Perhaps the $60Bn earmarked for the high speed train would be better spent on infrastructure for moving water rather than people between No Cal and So Cal.

castaicjack: Posted: January 17, 2014 6:24 p.m.

Does the Newhall Land and Farming "planned" development of 20,000+ homes off the 126 and the Tejon Land Management "planned" development of 20,000+ homes near Gorman take into into account the effects of a permanent drought? How about the 1,045 single family homes "planned" for Castaic, including the 500 highlighted earlier this week replete with a water-sucking golf course?
Didn't think so...

bobforte: Posted: January 17, 2014 7:00 p.m.

Obviously Castaicjack didn't read the first paragraph of the article he is referencing. Here it is: "Los Angeles County planners are moving ahead with a nearly 500-home development on Hasley Canyon Road in Castaic where 200 luxury homes and a golf course designed by legend Arnold Palmer were previously planned." Notice where it says "previously planned"?

Read the article a little more Jack and you will see there no longer is a golf course involved with this project.

castaicjack: Posted: January 17, 2014 7:30 p.m.

I heard they dropped the golf course and the luxury home idea years ago only to have the development increase in size from around 200 homes to 500 and instead of the 750,000 gallon water tank feeding the golf course, it'll feed their "community" center and 19 acre park instead and the latter isn't going to be a rock garden, either...

UsualSuspect: Posted: January 17, 2014 7:55 p.m.

The County and the Cities should stop any new builders from installing grass in the front yards, and go with a drought resistant and natural plants in the front. More water is used on landscaping than anything else. This place was a desert to start, and the landscaping should reflect this. I wonder why no one has mentioned drought except a few cities in the past 2 years? What happens if next winter is like this one? Do the water purveyors have any clue about future planning?

ricketzz: Posted: January 18, 2014 6:15 a.m.

Not quite a desert. (In deserts it rains once in a while.) Our natural foliage is pretty cool, but an occasional prickly pear doesn't make it a desert. I did have a roadrunner in my front yard once..

LosRubios: Posted: January 18, 2014 9:08 a.m.

Yet, here in So Cal, Pyramid Lake is still over 98% of its capacity and Castaic is sitting around 88% since the message delivered here in So Cal to conserve water has evidently sunk home.

Rocketeer: Posted: January 18, 2014 12:54 p.m.

Just last month Jerry Brown and the Sacramento Democrats unveiled their $24.7 billion dollar plan to build 60 miles of water tunnels from northern to southern California. You read that right- almost $25B for 60 miles of tunnel or about $416M per mile!

Not unsurprisingly voters were less than happy with this ridiculous boondoggle. So they tried to sell it as "necessary and vital in case of future droughts." About a week later I noticed that Upper Van Norman Lake suddenly lost about 90% of its water. That's the highly visible reservoir along the 5 Fwy. I suspect the water was quietly shifted to less visible reservoirs. The better to sell the scam, you see.

And now, suddenly, we're in the "worst drought ever." Even drinking water could be affected!

So just like Jerry Brown threatened to destroy California schools if he didn't get his tax increases in 2012, now he's threatening to let us all die of thirst if we don't hand over the $24.7?

Life under Democrat rule.

LStaedtler: Posted: January 21, 2014 5:44 p.m.

The Van Norman Lake/Dam is part of the Los Angeles Aqueduct system, not the California Water project. Two different water systems. Jerry Brown's plan has nothing to do regarding the Van Norman dam.

You need to be a registered user to post a comment. Please click here to register.

The Signal encourages readers to interact with one another, following the guidelines outlined in our Comment/Moderation Policy. Click here to read it.

To report offensive or inappropriate comments, e-mail The content posted from readers of does not necessarily represent the views of The Signal or Morris Multimedia. By submitting this form you agree to the terms and conditions listed above. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.


Powered By
Morris Technology
Please wait ...