View Mobile Site
 

Ask the Expert

Signal Photos

Tim Myers: A decline in enrollment hits the SCV

Posted: March 16, 2013 2:00 a.m.
Updated: March 16, 2013 2:00 a.m.
 

When we moved to the SCV in 1996, the big educational news of that time revolved around over-strained elementary and secondary school facilities.

The Newhall School District famously went to year round multi-track schedules at most of its locations, meaning that one could find only 75 percent of the student community on campus at any given moment.

Helmers Elementary, the (at that moment) crown jewel of the Saugus Union School District, housed just under 1,000 students on a campus originally designed for 450 to 600 students, with portable buildings shoe-horned on every square foot of the acreage.

In the secondary school arena, four middle schools and four comprehensive high schools burst at the seams so horribly that one local principal went renegade and implemented a special schedule, unapproved by the district office, that allowed for the staggered entry of students into class over the hours of 7 a.m. to 9 a.m.

Fast forward to 2013 and see what occurred: The William S. Hart Union High School District built two additional middle schools and two additional high schools.

The Newhall and Saugus Union school districts enacted bond after bond and seemed to build a school in every new neighborhood. Problem solved? Perhaps not. Golden Valley High School, with consistently low enrollment, struggles to effectively compete in the Foothill League.

Saugus Union recently closed an elementary school and struggles to populate the schools of West Creek and Emblem.

Newhall School District recently issued required layoff notices to a group of teachers due to declining enrollment.

So what occurred? At the risk of acting rationally, let us look at some actual data.

In 2005, the earliest year where one can find data available on the California Department of Education website, Saugus Union enjoyed about 7,500 students over 14 locations. These 14 locations included the two new locations (since 1996) of Northpark and Plum Canyon Elementary.

In 2012, Saugus Union supported 15 locations (with the closure of Bouquet Canyon Elementary) and total enrollment DROPPED to just about 7,200. These included the new locations of West Creek and Tesoro del Valle elementary schools.

Yes, folks, you read that right. With aggregate enrollment actually in retreat, the Saugus district added two new physical locations while closing one — a net addition of one.

Now for the Newhall School District, in 2005 it supported nine locations, including the new (since 1996) locations of McGrath and Pico Canyon elementary schools, with just under 5,000 students.

Fast forward to 2012 and Newhall Elementary now supports 10 locations (Oak Creek Elementary new since 2005) and educates a complement of basically the same enrolled head count as 2005.

So, while Newhall did not commit the colossal error of adding capacity with enrollment in decline, it did add brand-new capacity in the face of flat enrollment.

But what about the Hart district? In 2005, the Hart district supported six middle schools and six comprehensive high schools, with Rancho Pico, Rio Norte, Golden Valley and West Ranch new since 1996 and a total enrollment of just over 16,800.

And in 2012, the same six middle schools and six comprehensive high schools, but now a total aggregate enrollment (including some new charter schools) of a bit over 18,000.

But remember, Newhall and Saugus (and Sulphur Springs School District and Castaic Union School District) provide pretty much the sole feeders into the Hart district. So the flat or declining enrollment of those districts will soon translate into lower head counts at the Hart district.

And yes, the Hart district plans to open a new high school in the Castaic area at about the same time that demographic decline will hit.

Can one assign blame? Not really, because only a few pessimistic voices in the early part of this century provided a counterbalance to the exuberant voices that supported the extrapolated bubble-driven growth curve that would justify all these new facilities.

And make no mistake, growth will once again occur, though not at the breakneck speeds seen in the late 1990s and early 2000s.

And hopefully, the pickup in growth will occur soon enough that wise and experienced people will remember the bust and temper the slope of the extrapolated growth curve when making important and potentially expensive infrastructure decisions.

Tim Myers is a Valencia resident. "Myers’ Musings" runs Saturdays in The Signal.

Mar. 16, 2013 02:00a.m. EDT Tim Myers: A decline in enrollment hits the SCV The Signal

When we moved to the SCV in 1996, the big educational news of that time revolved around over-strained elementary and secondary school facilities.

The Newhall School District famously went to year round multi-track schedules at most of its locations, meaning that one could find only 75 percent of the student community on campus at any given moment.

Helmers Elementary, the (at that moment) crown jewel of the Saugus Union School District, housed just under 1,000 students on a campus originally designed for 450 to 600 students, with portable buildings shoe-horned on every square foot of the acreage.

In the secondary school arena, four middle schools and four comprehensive high schools burst at the seams so horribly that one local principal went renegade and implemented a special schedule, unapproved by the district office, that allowed for the staggered entry of students into class over the hours of 7 a.m. to 9 a.m.

Fast forward to 2013 and see what occurred: The William S. Hart Union High School District built two additional middle schools and two additional high schools.

The Newhall and Saugus Union school districts enacted bond after bond and seemed to build a school in every new neighborhood. Problem solved? Perhaps not. Golden Valley High School, with consistently low enrollment, struggles to effectively compete in the Foothill League.

Saugus Union recently closed an elementary school and struggles to populate the schools of West Creek and Emblem.

Newhall School District recently issued required layoff notices to a group of teachers due to declining enrollment.

So what occurred? At the risk of acting rationally, let us look at some actual data.

In 2005, the earliest year where one can find data available on the California Department of Education website, Saugus Union enjoyed about 7,500 students over 14 locations. These 14 locations included the two new locations (since 1996) of Northpark and Plum Canyon Elementary.

In 2012, Saugus Union supported 15 locations (with the closure of Bouquet Canyon Elementary) and total enrollment DROPPED to just about 7,200. These included the new locations of West Creek and Tesoro del Valle elementary schools.

Yes, folks, you read that right. With aggregate enrollment actually in retreat, the Saugus district added two new physical locations while closing one — a net addition of one.

Now for the Newhall School District, in 2005 it supported nine locations, including the new (since 1996) locations of McGrath and Pico Canyon elementary schools, with just under 5,000 students.

Fast forward to 2012 and Newhall Elementary now supports 10 locations (Oak Creek Elementary new since 2005) and educates a complement of basically the same enrolled head count as 2005.

So, while Newhall did not commit the colossal error of adding capacity with enrollment in decline, it did add brand-new capacity in the face of flat enrollment.

But what about the Hart district? In 2005, the Hart district supported six middle schools and six comprehensive high schools, with Rancho Pico, Rio Norte, Golden Valley and West Ranch new since 1996 and a total enrollment of just over 16,800.

And in 2012, the same six middle schools and six comprehensive high schools, but now a total aggregate enrollment (including some new charter schools) of a bit over 18,000.

But remember, Newhall and Saugus (and Sulphur Springs School District and Castaic Union School District) provide pretty much the sole feeders into the Hart district. So the flat or declining enrollment of those districts will soon translate into lower head counts at the Hart district.

And yes, the Hart district plans to open a new high school in the Castaic area at about the same time that demographic decline will hit.

Can one assign blame? Not really, because only a few pessimistic voices in the early part of this century provided a counterbalance to the exuberant voices that supported the extrapolated bubble-driven growth curve that would justify all these new facilities.

And make no mistake, growth will once again occur, though not at the breakneck speeds seen in the late 1990s and early 2000s.

And hopefully, the pickup in growth will occur soon enough that wise and experienced people will remember the bust and temper the slope of the extrapolated growth curve when making important and potentially expensive infrastructure decisions.

Tim Myers is a Valencia resident. "Myers’ Musings" runs Saturdays in The Signal.

Copyright 2011 MorrisMultimedia . All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed

Comments

chefgirl358: Posted: March 17, 2013 2:04 a.m.

A big part of the decline is people private schooling or homeschooling, and that trend will only continue. It's the only way to ensure kids get the education you want them to have, in an environment you approve of, without the ever increasing fees, taxes, bonds and other bull crap, that never trickles down to the classroom anyway.


cgoodman: Posted: March 18, 2013 9:51 a.m.

Your data figures are way off the mark. There has been over 18,000 students in the Hart District for over a decade. If you go to the California Public School Directory at http://data1.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/DQReports.asp?CDSType=D&CDSCode=1965136 you can see enrollment data for the Hart District from 2011-12 to the 90's. Even discounting the charter schools and alternative schools, Hart District enrollment has hovered between 20,000 and 23,000 going back to 2005. Please check your facts before making generalizations.


CaptGene: Posted: March 18, 2013 10:49 a.m.

cgoodman, you get used to that kind of thing from Myers, it's a mystery why TMS entertains his brand of crazy at all.


timothymyers02: Posted: March 18, 2013 12:54 p.m.

cgoodman:

I am aware of that data set but if you look at the definition of that number it includes a number of enrollee's on "Information Day" in October which the definitions admit will be higher than average daily attendance. Also, the Hart District number includes the enrollment of a complex of alternative charter high schools concentrated in the Antelope Valley. These enterprises (and they are money spinning enterprises because they receive the same state payments as a comprehensive high school, yet operate out of mini-mall storefronts where students show up two to three days a week to go over independent study plans) make special efforts to recruit a lot of students early in the year to pump up the October numbers, which then quickly dissipate.

A 23,000 enrollment would mean that each and every location in the Hart District would have just short of 2,900 students, and that is just not the case. One would be lucky to find 1,300 students at Golden Valley or 1,900 at Hart High School on any given day.


cgoodman: Posted: March 21, 2013 9:45 a.m.

It is my job to run numbers for the Hart District on a weekly basis and that 23,000 in October did NOT include OFL, Mission View, SCVI or Einstein. Those schools are self reporting, although the state factors in their graduation and dropout rates into the Hart District. The total enrollment as of today at just the 6 comprehensive junior highs and high schools is 21,477. There are 1205 students attending Academy of the Canyons, Bowman, Learning Post, Hart at Home, Sequoia, Transitional Learning Program and Non-Public special ed schools. We have a 95% attendance rate, so your Golden Valley attendance numbers are ludicrous. The District is subject to lengthy annual audits of attendance and ADA, so the data is intensely scrutinized. With the district's permission, I'd be happy to share the reports with you.



You need to be a registered user to post a comment. Please click here to register.

The Signal encourages readers to interact with one another, following the guidelines outlined in our Comment/Moderation Policy. Click here to read it.

To report offensive or inappropriate comments, e-mail abuse@signalscv.com. The content posted from readers of signalscv.com does not necessarily represent the views of The Signal or Morris Multimedia. By submitting this form you agree to the terms and conditions listed above. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

 
 

Powered By
Morris Technology
Please wait ...