View Mobile Site

Ask the Expert

Signal Photos


David Hegg: Sacrifice and success

Posted: February 16, 2014 2:00 a.m.
Updated: February 16, 2014 2:00 a.m.

If I seem a little grouchy there’s a reason. My wife and I have embarked on a 28-day food intake program (read: diet!) that has one simple, basic rule: If it tastes good, spit it out!

For four weeks we have to eliminate two of my favorites, coffee and wine. And that’s just the start! Giving up dairy isn’t that hard because I don’t really like ice cream, and there’s no need for cream without the coffee. But the list of things we can eat is only a bit longer than the number of columns my detractors have agreed with. Needless to say, it promises to be a long month.

So why would otherwise reasonable people like us engage in something that won’t be easy, and certainly will demand long-term self-control? It’s simple. We have decided that the benefit outweighs the pain. We have committed ourselves to the proposition that a month of self-denial will yield better health, better medical numbers, and the ability to wear most all the clothes hanging in our closets. And as an added bonus, we’re trusting that four weeks of doing right will replace old eating habits with new ones that are better in the long fun.

Underlying all this are two ethical values that are often forgotten, or denied. Most worthwhile things come at a cost, and if we put off that cost long enough, it can become overwhelming. The ethical principles at play here are incrementalism and delayed gratification.

Incrementalism is the slow march of compromise that ends up in tragedy. It is the process by which we become morbidly obese even though no one ever wants to be 50 pounds overweight. No one really wants to grow out of their favorite clothes. It just happens because we allow small compromises, small indulgences to become habitual without realizing the tragic consequences. This same process is happening in myriad ways in our society from economics and education to entertainment and its sense of what is morally acceptable.

Delayed gratification is the principle that I have to put off indulging myself now in order to have a more satisfying experience later. It is the only way to overcome the effects of incrementalism. At some point, we have to stop the madness, no matter how insignificant any single action may seem. We simply have to acknowledge that our appetites have taken control over our reason, and we have to learn to say “no” to ourselves. We have to take the pain now, change our thinking, adopt a better set of habits, and walk in a different direction.

As I listen to the news and read about the struggles we are facing as a nation it is clear that, collectively, our society has “incrementaled” itself into a kind of lazy, sloppy, functional obesity. We’ve become a nation of entitled adolescents, and I fear we are close to losing any sense of self-discipline. To right the ship we’ll have to make some hard commitments, trim some fat, say “no” to unhealthy economic and social appetites, and just generally grit our teeth and take the pain. If we keep living the way we are, we’ll keep getting what we’ve got, and while much is good in America, we’re drifting toward economic and moral tragedy with smiles on our faces. The best things in life are found on the other side of morality, courage, and self-control. Let’s pray we haven’t forgotten how to be a nation of mature adults who are willing to sacrifice now in order to create an honorable future for our children. Now excuse me as I go have my breakfast of tree bark and filtered water.

David Hegg is senior pastor of Grace Baptist Church and a Santa Clarita resident. “Ethically Speaking” runs every Sunday.



ricketzz: Posted: February 16, 2014 6:58 a.m.

"We’ve become a nation of entitled adolescents, and I fear we are close to losing any sense of self-discipline."

The Rev must travel in strange circles. Have they not heard that "austerity" is the rule of the day? Or maybe austerity is just for poor people..

technologist: Posted: February 16, 2014 11:09 a.m.

We're accustomed to your postings being counterfactual, ricketzz.

Debunking Krugman's European Austerity Narrative

"European austerity has been focused on the private sector — namely, taxpayers with high incomes. That is the second thing the PIIGGS have in common. The highest income tax rate was recently increased in every one of the troubled PIIGGS except Italy (where it was already too high at 43%). The top tax rate was hiked from 40 to 46.5% in Portugal, from 41 to 48% in Ireland, from 40 to 45% in Greece, from 40 to 50% in Great Britain, and from 48 to 52% in Spain."

Read more:

ricketzz: Posted: February 17, 2014 6:58 a.m.

Krugman? European? WTH? The Rev hangs out at Princeton?

As the Pope is fond of pointing out Trickle Down doesn't work. We allow people like Mitt Romney to pay 12% yet someone in the low 6 figures pays 3 times that. We tax work more than we tax people who live off dividends and create nothing. This is immoral. The Rev theoretically lives in the moral/amoral domain (more time in the amoral-immoral camp lately it seems).

When the private sector stops hiring the public sector better start something or the cities will burn down like they used to every summer. The most dangerous thing to civilization is angry poor people with nothing to lose and lots of free time.

You need to be a registered user to post a comment. Please click here to register.

The Signal encourages readers to interact with one another, following the guidelines outlined in our Comment/Moderation Policy. Click here to read it.

To report offensive or inappropriate comments, e-mail The content posted from readers of does not necessarily represent the views of The Signal or Morris Multimedia. By submitting this form you agree to the terms and conditions listed above. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.


Powered By
Morris Technology
Please wait ...