View Mobile Site
 

Ask the Expert

Signal Photos

 

Steve Knight: Failed laws threaten communities

Posted: February 14, 2014 2:00 a.m.
Updated: February 14, 2014 2:00 a.m.
 

Federal judges recently granted California two more years to reduce its inmate population to 137.5 percent of the capacity that the 33 state’s prisons were built to hold, moving the deadline from June 2013 to February 2016.

This begs the question: How has California been fairing since 2009, when it was ordered to address prison overcrowding?

In response, Gov. Brown signed Assembly Bill 109 in 2011, called the “Public Safety Realignment Act,” which redefines the responsibility for supervising certain convicted felons from the state to the local level.

Interestingly, this statute states it was not enacted due to prison overcrowding, but to combat recidivism and to address California’s dire fiscal emergency — and it has resulted in huge risks to public safety.

Since then, the ill-conceived prison realignment law has shifted thousands of inmates from the state prison to the county jail and from the county jail to our streets, dramatically impacting our criminal justice system and innocent citizens.

AB 109 revises the punishments of “non-serious, non-violent, and non-sex-related” felony offenders with local jail time or even probation instead of prison.

But the state’s prisons, built to house the worst of the worst, and jails, meant to contain low-level offenders or those awaiting trial, are not synonymous.

The non-serious, non-violent, and non-sex-related clause is a huge loophole for hardened criminals to return to the streets at shockingly rapid rates.

Among the “non-serious” state prisoners shifted to local jails are those convicted of second violations including domestic violence, assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury, vehicular manslaughter while under the influence of drugs or alcohol, and even sex-offender parolees who tamper with their GPS devices.

Studies show that nearly 20 percent of former state prisoners who were realigned to serve probation sentences under Los Angeles County’s jurisdiction went unaccounted for and had outstanding arrest warrants.

County agencies struggle to force these hardened criminals to report to their probation officers or attend mandated mental health and substance abuse treatment programs that are supposed to result in lower recidivism rates.

It is easy to see why so many law enforcement officials have publicly criticized AB 109.

According to the Sacramento-based Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, crime statistics across California are considerably higher than the national figure, citing the fact that Californians have seen an alarming 9.7 percent upswing in serious property crimes within large- and medium-sized cities while the nationwide average dropped 0.8 percent.

“Proponents of realignment have emphasized that ‘violent offenders’ remain sentenced to state prison, with the implication that mere property offenses are not a major concern. They are.

“The crime of auto theft is a severe blow to persons of modest income,” the foundation states in a recent study.

“It is a ‘regressive’ crime that falls much harder on regular working folks than it does on the elitists who brush off property crime as a minor concern.”

While realignment was enacted to help meet federal court rulings that found inadequate medical and mental health care for prison inmates — as well as a way to reduce the state’s budget deficit — according to Los Angeles

County officials, introducing hardened criminals, who would have been in state prisons pre-AB 109, into already-crowded local jails means that some offenders are released after serving just 10 percent of their sentences.

Take, for example, the arrest of Sidney Jerome DeAvila, who disabled his ankle bracelet at least seven times but served little time behind bars.

In fact, DeAvila was sentenced 30 days in the San Joaquin County jail for tampering with his bracelet and failing to register as a sex offender, yet a judge ordered his release after one week due to overcrowding.

Within a week he was arrested for robbing, raping and killing his 76-year-old grandmother in her home. Sadly, it is easy to assume this case may have been contained, if not altogether prevented, pre-AB 109.

As a former police officer, I know first-hand that the protection of public safety must be the No. 1 issue. The awful results of AB 109 need to be acknowledged; legislators should come to the bargaining table and budget responsibly, addressing the dire fiscal emergency that forced AB 109 implementation and make realignment a thing of the past.

Fewer prisoners in our jails is a respectable goal, but until we change our broken system, I want fewer criminals on our streets.

Sen. Steve Knight, R-Lancaster, represents the 21st Senate District in the California Legislature, including communities in the Antelope, Santa Clarita and Victor valleys. He is also a Republican candidate for Congress in this year’s election.

 

Comments

Luigi: Posted: February 14, 2014 8:51 a.m.

I can't argue with any of what Senator Knight has written. Well done Senator!


Luigi: Posted: February 14, 2014 8:54 a.m.

User Removed Comment.


OldReliable: Posted: February 14, 2014 11:21 a.m.

Maybe he will win the GOP primary.... maybe?


technologist: Posted: February 15, 2014 10:02 p.m.

Public safety is a role for government that all agree on.

Rather than funding a "bullet" train to solve a nonexistent problem, Sacramento should serve the real security needs of citizens.


ginnyp: Posted: February 15, 2014 12:15 p.m.

What happened to the monies that the State has to build new prisons? Why hasn't that happened? It's been a few years since that money was approved.


Indy: Posted: February 16, 2014 7:41 p.m.

Knight sadly misses the point as to why the US incarcerates more people than any other nation on earth.

Our social fabric is being weakened by the concentration of wealth in America that seeks to create a permanent lower class that is targeted for incarceration.

We know that about 85 of inmates are ‘functionally illiterate’ yet republicans for the last 20 years have fought against tax increased to properly fund our schools.

Even today, 1 student in 4 drops out and has been doing so for 3+ decades: yet not a word from Mr. Knight on education.

It’s sad that we have someone representing us that has so little insight into the bigger picture facing us.

But it’s not unexpected that a conservative republican would pronounce his support for more taxes for more prisions.


technologist: Posted: February 16, 2014 8:49 p.m.

"Our social fabric is being weakened by the concentration of wealth in America that seeks to create a permanent lower class that is targeted for incarceration."

Non sequitur. How does that serve the purpose of those you wish to demonize and dispossess, Indy?


Indy: Posted: February 17, 2014 12:08 p.m.

technologist wrote: "Our social fabric is being weakened by the concentration of wealth in America that seeks to create a permanent lower class that is targeted for incarceration."

Non sequitur. How does that serve the purpose of those you wish to demonize and dispossess, Indy?

Indy: Again, when you can’t argue the point or don’t understand the economics in play here you get this type of nonsensical response . . .

Notice the poster 'ignored' all the points I made . . . including the effect of education on incarceration.



technologist: Posted: February 17, 2014 7:07 p.m.

Indy:

I inquired about a "point" you made, noting its illogic.

You made the assertion and I challenged it. It's yours to defend. Attacking me does nothing to prove the basis for your assertion. Answer it or quit.


Indy: Posted: February 19, 2014 1:17 p.m.

technologist wrote: I inquired about a "point" you made, noting its illogic.
You made the assertion and I challenged it. It's yours to defend.

Indy: I always find this approach of this poster interesting where he tries write something and says absolutely nothing.

He ignores the responses that disagree with his ideology and I guess feels ‘empowered’ writing such quick quips?

technologist wrote:Attacking me does nothing to prove the basis for your assertion. Answer it or quit.

Indy: LOL


technologist: Posted: February 20, 2014 9:36 a.m.

More projection because you can't defend your nonsensical assertion that it somehow benefits the wealthy who "seeks to create a permanent lower class that is targeted for incarceration."

It is you that exhibits extreme verbosity with little to no content.


Indy: Posted: March 9, 2014 3:48 p.m.

technologist wrote: More projection because you can't defend your nonsensical assertion that it somehow benefits the wealthy who "seeks to create a permanent lower class that is targeted for incarceration." It is you that exhibits extreme verbosity with little to no content.

Indy: PYOTB


technologist: Posted: March 10, 2014 6:16 p.m.

"Indy: PYOTB" =

"That’s one of the reasons why it appears I know all the answers since I have the MBA plus the years of experience running a business." - Indy Posted: February 11, 2014 7:20 p.m.

http://www.signalscv.com/section/33/article/113798/



You need to be a registered user to post a comment. Please click here to register.

The Signal encourages readers to interact with one another, following the guidelines outlined in our Comment/Moderation Policy. Click here to read it.

To report offensive or inappropriate comments, e-mail abuse@signalscv.com. The content posted from readers of signalscv.com does not necessarily represent the views of The Signal or Morris Multimedia. By submitting this form you agree to the terms and conditions listed above. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

 
 

Powered By
Morris Technology
Please wait ...