View Mobile Site

Ask the Expert

Signal Photos


Joe Gandelman: Don’t count Chris Christie out (yet)

Posted: January 20, 2014 2:00 a.m.
Updated: January 20, 2014 2:00 a.m.

People waiting to get New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie’s last pound of flesh may have a long wait, and not for the obvious reason.

In case you’ve been on Mars, polls have shown Christie to be one of the country’s hottest properties, a Republican who won re-election by 22 points in a blue state by wooing and winning over many Democrats and independents.
Is his seeming fast-track to the national top now short-circuited?

Many pundits considered Christie a prime contender for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination, even though he’s despised by many conservatives who vow to fight him all the way.

But then it came out that some of his top aides were involved in creating massive traffic back-ups to punish a Democratic mayor.

“Buh-bye” to four Christie loyalists who were fired or resigned.

“Hiya” to the term “Bridgegate” and a two-hour Christie-on-the-defensive press conference that those sympathetic to him found masterful and those who don’t like him found phony.

But is the power abuse stench enough to sink him? A poll by the Pew Research Center found that more people focused on cold weather and a tepid economy than Christie, and most said the scandal hadn’t changed their opinion of him.

The Washington Post’s Chris Cillizza flatly says Christie remains the “best positioned to build the coalition of major donors, party activists and GOP elites necessary to win the nomination.”

In his column on The Moderate Voice, veteran journalist Shaun Mullen argues that 2016 is a long way off — and the GOP desperately needs Christie:

“I continue to believe that while Teahadists are powerful beyond their numbers, they have painted the party into an ideological corner that pretty much guarantees increasing national irrelevance,” Mullen wrote.

“While the stars might have to be aligned just so for Christie to get the Republican nomination, only he is capable of giving [Hillary] Clinton a run for her money. 

“This is because many of the policies and points of view the governor espouses are in sync with voters in general, if not right-wing Republicans, including those all-important Independent women.

“These include gun control, immigration reform, Medicaid expansion, gay rights and, yes, good old-fashioned compromising.”

Things to watch:

1. Will there be a smoking gun? Richard Nixon would likely have remained in office — if you lived through the times you can recall how steadfastly he was defended by Republicans until they realized there was absolutely no defense left — if he hadn’t installed the taping system or if the tapes had been erased.

No solid smoking gun means Christie may still has some baggage to carry if he wants to get a huge number of independent voters and some Democrats to vote for him in a general election, but he’s still in the running.

But he’s increasingly on shaky ground. He had insisted in his press conference that he hadn’t seen David Wildstein, the former Port Authority of New York and New Jersey executive who ordered the lane closures on the George Washington Bridge in September, in a “long, long time, well before the election.”

Then the Wall Street Journal published an article showing photos of him standing next to the resigned official on Sept. 11 — the third day of the bridge lane closures. Not good for Christie’s narrative — or branding as a straight shooter.

2. Will he move to the right? Some analysts claim Christie got “creds” with tea partiers due to the bridge incident and his assertive press conference.

While some establishment-type center-right Republicans defend him, he could have to move to the right to try and thwart or win over far-right conservatives who don’t want him on the ticket.

3. Will the press find material to keep the story alive? Contrary to what conservatives think, journalists and editors don’t get in touch with each other, rub their hands with delight and conspire to do stories.

They try to answer unanswered questions in stories. Every time a Christie assertion is proven wrong, it’ll prolong the bigger story.

So is today Christie doomed? Unless something major comes out — to quote another famous New Jerseyan — “fahgettaboudit.”

Copyright 2014 Joe Gandelman. Distributed exclusively by Cagle Cartoons newspaper syndicate.


ricketzz: Posted: January 20, 2014 6:26 a.m.

My opinion of Chris Christie has not been changed by the Fort Lee incident. It has in fact been reinforced.

therightstuff: Posted: January 20, 2014 9:32 a.m.

If only the mainstream media had gone after the terrorist attack in Benghazi and the outrageous lies that Obama and Clinton told in the aftermath as they are consumed about some lane closures in New Jersey.

The only reason Democrats and their subservient wh0res in the mainstream media are going after Christie is because he scares the hell out of them! Sarah Palin also threatened their strangle hold on women which is why they launched an all-out assault to destroy her personally. They don't even try to hide their bias any more.

17trillion: Posted: January 20, 2014 11:22 a.m.

Christie is in a long line of so called Republican "moderates" that the MSM slobs over until they get popular enough to crap on. Christie is Bob Dole, HW Bush, John McCain, and Mitt Romney all rolled up into one little neat moderate pile. The only "conservative" president we've had lately was GW Bush who WAS NOT A CONSERVATIVE AT ALL and was even more liberal than the above squishy Repubs.

I understand Christie can't run as a conservative in New Jersey. It is what it is, but now that he's been elected twice, I would expect to see his true colors and I'm not impressed. Naturally I will vote for him if it comes down to him and the Wicked Witch of the East, but I will not support his efforts. Libs naturally will wet their pants if he gets elected but the only difference between Christie and Obama is that Christie is a tiny bit less liberal than Obama. Same diff as far as I'm concerned which makes their hatred of Bush all the more insane. In policy after policy Bush is almost exactly like Obama and vice versa.

ricketzz: Posted: January 22, 2014 5:57 a.m.

We deserve better..

Socalguy: Posted: January 23, 2014 10:24 a.m.

Let me count the ways.... ONE, TWO...

You need to be a registered user to post a comment. Please click here to register.

The Signal encourages readers to interact with one another, following the guidelines outlined in our Comment/Moderation Policy. Click here to read it.

To report offensive or inappropriate comments, e-mail The content posted from readers of does not necessarily represent the views of The Signal or Morris Multimedia. By submitting this form you agree to the terms and conditions listed above. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.


Powered By
Morris Technology
Please wait ...